When will the Wright story get Right and the Wrong story be Gone. Seems like eternity since the "doctored tape of Dr Jeremiah Wright's sermon" was completed tinkered into an unbelievable jester by the media to lower the esteem of Senator Barrack O'Bama to a level below the lowest in order to embellish their desire to assist Senator Hillary Clinton to win.

But one only has to look backwards to February 28th for a scorecard to show the emphasis that was declared "fair-game-day" via the Cable TV ---one political "analyst" even admitted he supported Clinton. But, that aside as puny considering the real thrusts being bobbled for Hillary. On February 29th a telemarketer revealed a movie making project for Hillary and Barrack ----furthering an appeal to "vote for Hillary " ---and why ---McCain believes he can "whoop" Clinton but is not sure about O'Bama.

And then turn to the "promises unkept" by President Bush re: the large lobby - [first on list = Invasion of Iran] and the perhaps "keeping of those promises" since they are all related to the large lobby family —only two candidates have agreed to be supportive —the other being O’Bama ---who has not agreed.

And the daily Wright story ----just can’t escape the Cable TV’s hosts active remembrances of yesterday. The true story has never been "remembered by the Cable people" –only the fabricated - out of context story that actually is so wrong it cannot be made right by the media. Of course they are not going to try anyway.

The "sermon" as heard on the "Cable Tape" is only a sliver of the actual sermon and is purposefully cut so the listeners do not have the opportunity to hear the part before and after the asserted "garbage" that Dr Wright refers to his switch from the sermon to "what a lot of others are also saying about the conditions today" –and the words per "cable tape" are the same words as "the FOX tape" during an interview on October 10^th and 11^th 2001 with FOX;s Linda Vester and Former Ambassador of Iraq –Dr Edward Peck. What Dr Wright was attempting to show was that "higher people in higher places are referencing this Iraq debacle differently than the media in general has afforded wisdom to the Public for explanation of the complete wrongs that have taken place since that invasion and even before by the President’s internal combustion to invade Iraq". If one believes the Invasion was only decided in 2003 –there needs to be more tracing of the dates of selection for Bush and his advisors ----going back to September 1997 and to May 98 when George W Bush was SELECTED to be ELECTED by the large lobby family.

Pray that the next President does not assume the "promises unkept" as an obligation of his or her duties in the oval office.

William J Clemons

willclem@grics.net

Mr Rusher, it is assumed that you earned your accolades through clearer thinking than displayed in your article blowout.

Why can't the people involved with the media "get it right the first time" so the Wright Story does not keep fermenting day after day ---when if Wright-ly told the PUBLIC could get a clear picture of WHAT REALLY OCCURRED and get the show off the road.

Anyone who has READ THE ENTIRE STORY realizes that what Dr Wright was saying came DIRECTLY FROM AN INTERVIEW ON OCTOBER 10-11 2001 WITH FOX's LINDA VESTER AND FORMER AMBASSADOR DR EDWARD PECK. In fact the first interview was so filled with upheaval of Vester's not letting Dr Peck talk, that the second day was demanded for clarity.

During that interview, the words and or the interjections and ideas that Dr Peck said [over a lot of objection by Vester] ---were related to in the "doctored tape" that the media so eloquently displayed a gillion times so all could see and hear the garbage ----but certainly not the true base of the sermon ----. The media put the spin on the story that THIS WAS DR WRIGHT'S WAY OF THINKING but if they would just let loose of the strings to the brain level, the PUBLIC WOULD REALIZE THAT THIS WAS ALL OUT OF CONTEXT ----and very well planned to throw the rest of Clinton's kitchen sink at O'Bama.

Most every reporter or "pretender to be a sensible correspondent" shouts their verbiage about Dr Wright's history when [1] they have not stepped foot into his church [2] have not heard directly from the pulpit his wonderful sermons [they are all recorded by the church but they ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE USED COMMERCIALLY [3] they have multiplied every small word, comma or hyphen to indicate his demeanor as being drastically full of stench.

Wake up America, the stories you are hearing and seeing and THINKING are far from the REAL THING. And if you aren't capable of attempting to understand the REAL THING instead of the FABRICATED THING then --shame on you ---and definitely shame on the media.

It is just TOO OBVIOUS that at least two of the large TV media has set their goals to assist Clinton to win --need only look at Feb 28th and through a week ago ---the intensity that was bent harshly from O'Bama and to Clinton approximately 14-1 exposures Clinton vs O'Bama on any given day. Even the political director on one show admitted on the air that he was BACKING CLINTON.

And a telemarketer on Feb 29 claiming to make a movie about Clinton/O'Bama --but the emphasis at the end MAKE SURE CLINTON WINS AS MCCAIN BELIEVES HE CAN BEAT HER BUT NOT SURE ABOUT O'BAMA.

Then the big shabang on Super Tuesday where large numbers of Republicans voted for Clinton ----partially due to a well known radio talk show host who advocated his audience to do so ----same as per above.

If you don't believe that there is an organized effort by some media to make sure Clinton wins ----again shame on you.

And if you haven't "just wondered why" then perhaps a trip to the internet will be enlightening ----there are many "promises unkept" that Bush has hanging on his back ---he intends McCain to bail him out on those deficiencies with the large lobby and family. But if McCain doesn't win ----who will [or actually who has promised] attempt to keep those promises because of a latent obligation lingering in the background. Per a recent meeting with all three candidates, only O’Bama refused any commitment to help that cause. The others are referred to as "great friends".

Throughout all the "push and pull to pull the wool" there is a very dangerous "promise unkept" —which a well known official demands to occur not later than June 08. But the Public is not being fore warned any more than "what’s for breakfast".

william j clemons

willclem@grics.net